Between Two Fields

IMG_3671
So, it’s been a while since I’ve posted anything here on the old blog, and some interesting things have occurred in my diabetes life since the beginning of the year.  I’ve been struggling with processing some news I received last month and to find the words for this post, so bear with me.

On the 25th of January, I had an office visit with a new endocrinologist.  For the purposes of this post, we’ll call him Doc B.  Anyway, Doc B seems like a great guy. He was very easy to talk to, non-judgmental, and, most importantly, he was really interested in my case.  In his words, “It’s unique.”  Diagnosed with type 2 and CHF at 24, issues with medications not working, progression to insulin use within a short period, etc…  But two things stood out to him.  First, my c-peptide results indicate that I’m still producing a freakishly high amount of insulin.  So, insulin resistance is an issue.  I knew that already.  And secondly, the results of the GAD65 antibody test that was done before the appointment came back positive.  The report listed the result as GAD65 = 7.7  High.  This would indicate an autoimmune component to my diabetes, and it certainty raised several questions.

My first question was how long the GAD antibodies had been present.  Doc B looked back through my records and found results from 2 prior GAD65 tests.  One from about 4 years ago, and one from the time I was diagnosed a little over 7 years ago.  BOTH of those results were positive.  What the fructose?!  The word misdiagnosis quickly came to mind.  And, at this point, it certainly appears that’s what happened.

In hindsight, how it happened is pretty obvious to me.  A young guy walks into a doctor’s office with a yeast infection.  He’s fat, his blood sugars and A1c are FUBAR, and there’s a family history of diabetes.  So, he must have type 2 diabetes.  The early test results were basically brushed aside in part because of the mentioned factors, but also because the doctor didn’t specialize in that stuff.  And being new to all of this shit at the time, I didn’t know any better.   Thankfully, I do now.  But the more I know, the more it pisses me off that this shit happens.

So, the next obvious question is: what type of diabetes do I really have?  I have characteristics of both type 1 and type 2, and don’t fall squarely into either one.  So what the hell do I call it?  Doc B seemed to think LADA/1.5 might be appropriate, but wasn’t quite ready to change my diagnosis just yet.  He wants to do a few more tests before making that call, but it seems likely to happen soon.  The one thing he did say was that the countdown clock on my pancreas function is ticking.  Unfortunately, we can’t see the timer.  Not exactly reassuring.

As far as treatment goes, not a whole lot is changing, regardless of what type I may have.  I’m still on Humalog for meals and Lantus at night, Victoza, and Jardiance.  And I will be trying Toujeo in the near future.  That much I do know.  And keeping that stable and consistent helps.

That still leaves questions in my mind about my advocacy efforts in the community and how a change in labels might impact that. I’ve identified as a type 2 for 7 years.  That’s all I’ve known.  That’s how I’m known in the community.  And I’ve always been proud to support and advocate for people with all types of diabetes.  That’s not going to change.  I love my DOC friends and family.

To be honest, right now I’m feeling sad, angry, confused, and a million other things all at once.  I’m like the hawk in the photo above, sitting on a lonely fence post between two fields, unsure of where to go next.

This entry was posted in Diabetes, Doctor Visits, Health, Medications. Bookmark the permalink.

88 Responses to Between Two Fields

  1. Kate Cornell's avatar Kate Cornell says:

    Oh Mike. Hugs and support and love. No matter what happens down the road, you’ve got this.

  2. StephenS's avatar StephenS says:

    For the record Mike, I only know you as an advocate and a Person With Diabetes. Types don’t mean anything to me. Hope you get answers soon, and real ones you can trust.

  3. Nikki Thomason's avatar Nikki Thomason says:

    {{{Mike}}}

    I’d be pissed off too. And wondering how this was missed.

    I know two people from my local group who were mis-Dx as having T2. It does happen, but it doesn’t making it any easier knowing this if you are one of the people it happens to!

    Hang in there, buddy. Know that you have support from a lot of online friends, and that some of them are looking forward to giving you a real hug in three weeks!

  4. Colleen's avatar Colleen says:

    You’re still our friend and a great photographer.
    And now you have a doctor who is working with you to find the correct answers.
    Remember – one day at a time…

  5. Jaclyn's avatar Jaclyn says:

    If your diagnosis changes, would that remove your advocacy role in the Type 2 community–or just change it? Maybe you stay in the community but as an advocate to make sure folks are getting proper diagnoses and then receiving proper treatment? I’m a firm believer in “If it can happen to me, it can happen to anyone.” Not that you want to go make everyone with Type 2 question themselves, but maybe you serve as some kind of “Heads Up!” story.

    Being told you are no longer “part of” something you’ve identified with for years can be tough to grasp, absolutely. And I don’t know too much about the community there, so this may come across as incredibly naive. But I suspect they’d still embrace you, embrace your story, and see all the wonderful things you can bring to the community and to diabetes advocacy.

    Sending you lots of calming, stress-free vibes during this time.

  6. Judi's avatar Judi says:

    Mike, sorry to hear that you are going thru such hard times. Luckily you’ve found a Dr that seems to know what he’s doing and is going to work thru it with you. As to the community, please don’t think that your friends will care if you are a T1, T2, or Tunknown. Advocating is helping and you can still help. As Jaclyn said above, it’s so true that “If it happened to me, it can happen to others.” That is a very important lesson to advocate. Good luck in figuring it all out.

  7. Mike's avatar Mike says:

    I am sorry this came your way, creating even more uncertainty and stress to what you’ve already had on tap. Hopefully, this doc can help bring more clarity (if ever possible?) to your D and Health World. As to DOC and D-advocacy, I know you’ll do whatever fits your world best. Thanks for all you’ve done and will continue doing for the community. Sending you my best, Mike.

  8. Karen's avatar Karen says:

    I can understand how tough this all feels. (Okay, I guess, actually, technically I can’t, but I can certainly empathize.) But no matter what, you will always be my type and I’ll always support you!

  9. Mary Dexter's avatar Mary Dexter says:

    Glad you found a better doctor. I, too, was initially misdiagnosed. Age, stereotypes, our society’s obsession with weight. The Sweet Lowdown, the play I wrote in response, can still be viewed on YouTube. Diabetes is more a continuum than an either/or dichotomy. As an advocate, we need to bring a better, more scientific view of diabetes to the world.

  10. Jean's avatar Jean says:

    I volunteered at The San Diego Center For The Blind for many years. We had a few men that were wrongly diagnosed, then under treated, and then showed complications very rapidly. Even after one man was told by an endocrinologist he was a type 1 1/2, his primary care doctor still refused to believe in such a thing being possible!!?? So please keep doing what you are doing whatever “type” category of your blog.

  11. Tim Steinert's avatar Tim Steinert says:

    I know the feeling well. They didn’t even mention a Type almost seven years ago when I was gifted with the D.

    Your endo sounds like he’s looking at YOU, not what box to put you in. No better demonstration of YDMV.

  12. Pingback: De nombreuses personnes diagnostiquées avec un diabète de type 2 peuvent avoir une forme différente de la maladie – News 24

  13. Pingback: Many diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes may actually have a different form of the disease

  14. Pingback: Many diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes may have a different form of the disease - Blackamericahealth

  15. Pingback: De nombreuses personnes diagnostiquées avec un diabète de type 2 peuvent en réalité avoir une forme différente de la maladie. – News 24

  16. Pingback: These Patients Had to Lobby for Correct Diabetes Diagnoses. Was Their Race a Reason? - WebTimes

  17. Pingback: These Patients Had to Lobby for Correct Diabetes Diagnoses. Was Their Race a Reason? - Medicine Pharmacy Nutrition

  18. Pingback: These Patients Had to Lobby for Correct Diabetes Diagnoses. Was Their Race a Reason? - Sketo News

  19. Pingback: Medical News Watch | Latest Updates in Healthcare Sector

  20. Pingback: These Patients Had to Lobby for Correct Diabetes Diagnoses. Was Their Race a Reason?

  21. Pingback: These Patients Had to Lobby for Correct Diabetes Diagnoses. Was Their Race a Reason? – NRD Blogs

  22. Pingback: These Patients Had to Lobby for Correct Diabetes Diagnoses. Was Their Race a Reason? - ChroniclesLive

  23. Pingback: These Patients Had to Lobby for Correct Diabetes Diagnoses. Was Their Race a Reason? - Fyne Fettle

  24. Pingback: These Patients Had to Lobby for Correct Diabetes Diagnoses. Was Their Race a Reason? - Health & fitness News

  25. Pingback: These Patients Had to Lobby for Correct Diabetes Diagnoses. Was Their Race a Reason? – MonetizeHEALTH

  26. Pingback: These Patients Had to Lobby for Correct Diabetes Diagnoses. Was Their Race a Reason? - YoursBulletin

  27. Pingback: Ushbu bemorlar diabetga to'g'ri tashxis qo'yish uchun lobbi qilishlari kerak edi. Ularning irqi sabab bo'lganmi? - Kasallik

  28. Pingback: These Patients Had to Lobby for Correct Diabetes Diagnoses. Was Their Race a Reason? - California Healthline - Body Mind Health

  29. Pingback: These Patients Had to Lobby for Correct Diabetes Diagnoses. Was Their Race a Reason? - Khabar Filhal

  30. Pingback: These Patients Had to Lobby for Correct Diabetes Diagnoses. Was Their Race a Reason? - KFF Health News - The Keystone Gazette

  31. Pingback: These Patients Needed to Foyer for Correct Diabetes Diagnoses. Became once Their Experience a Reason? - The Tabloid Online

  32. Pingback: These Patients Had to Lobby for Correct Diabetes Diagnoses. Was Their Race a Reason? - The Newspaper - Nykaa.pk

  33. Pingback: Этим пациентам пришлось лоббировать правильный диагноз диабета. Была ли их раса причиной? - nachedeucom

  34. Pingback: Those Sufferers Needed to Foyer for Proper Diabetes Diagnoses. Used to be Their Race a Explanation why? - HEALTH WITH DIET

  35. Pingback: These patients had to lobby for correct diabetes diagnoses. Was their race a reason? | News Scrap

  36. Pingback: These patients had to lobby for correct diabetes diagnoses. Was their race a reason? – Big Bang Shares

  37. Pingback: These patients had to lobby for correct diabetes diagnoses. Was their race a reason? - WeirdReads

  38. Pingback: These patients had to lobby for correct diabetes diagnoses. Was their race a reason? – Stocks Of The Time

  39. Pingback: Esses pacientes tiveram que fazer lobby para diagnósticos corretos de diabetes. A raça deles foi um motivo? – Saúde & Bem Estar

  40. Pingback: These patients had to lobby for correct diabetes diagnoses. Was their race a reason? - Meta Payments Methods

  41. Pingback: These patients had to lobby for correct diabetes diagnoses. Was their race a reason? - The Socialist Letters

  42. Pingback: These sufferers needed to foyer for proper diabetes diagnoses. Was their race a purpose?

  43. Pingback: These patients had to lobby for correct diabetes diagnoses. Was their race a reason? -

  44. Pingback: These Patients Had to Lobby for Correct Diabetes Diagnoses. Was Their Race a Reason? – Health & fitness News

  45. Pingback: These patients had to lobby for correct diabetes diagnoses. Was their race a reason? – New York Digital News

  46. Pingback: These patients should lobby for the correct diagnosis of diabetes. Is their race a reason? - lineup-mag

  47. Pingback: You Need to Know: Many Diagnosed with Type 2 Diabetes May Have a Different Form of The Disease - The WFY

  48. Pingback: These Patients Had to Lobby for Correct Diabetes Diagnoses. Was Their Race a Reason? – KFF Health News – THE KNOWLEDGE PAL

  49. Pingback: These sufferers needed to foyer for proper diabetes diagnoses. Was their race a cause?

  50. Pingback: These Patients Had to Lobby for Correct Diabetes Diagnoses. Was Their Race a Reason? – Health & fitness News

  51. Pingback: These Individuals Experienced to Foyer for Appropriate Diabetic issues Diagnoses. Was Their Race a Rationale?

  52. Pingback: Patients lobbying for correct diabetes diagnoses worry race may have played a factor in treatment

  53. Pingback: Many diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes may actually have a different form of the disease – St. Louis Argus

  54. Pingback: These Patients Had to Lobby for Correct Diabetes Diagnoses. Was Their Race a Reason? – Neivo

  55. Pingback: These patients had to lobby for correct diabetes diagnoses. Was their race a reason? Tribune News Service — Local News | Pioneer Press – Romulan News Channel

  56. Pingback: These patients had to lobby for correct diabetes diagnoses. Was their race a reason? – The Denver Post - Planet Concerns

  57. Pingback: These patients had to lobby for correct diabetes diagnoses. Was their race a reason? - News Leaflets

  58. Pingback: These patients had to lobby for correct diabetes diagnoses. Was their race a reason? – Boston Herald - Planet Concerns

  59. Pingback: These patients had to lobby for correct diabetes diagnoses. Was their race a reason? – The Denver Post - YoursBulletin

  60. Pingback: These patients had to lobby for correct diabetes diagnoses. Was their race a reason? – Mega Portal24

  61. Pingback: These patients had to lobby for correct diabetes diagnoses. Was their race a reason? – News24 Summary

  62. Pingback: These patients had to lobby for correct diabetes diagnoses. Was their race a reason? – 24Space News

  63. Pingback: These patients had to lobby for correct diabetes diagnoses. Was their race a reason? – The Denver Post - ChroniclesLive

  64. Pingback: These patients had to lobby for correct diabetes diagnoses. Was their race a reason? – The Mercury News - NewsContinue

  65. Pingback: These patients had to lobby for correct diabetes diagnoses. Was their race a reason? – Monterey Herald

  66. Pingback: These patients had to lobby for correct diabetes diagnoses. Was their race a reason? – News Reports24

  67. Pingback: These patients had to lobby for correct diabetes diagnoses. Was their race a reason? – DailyUpdateNow24

  68. Pingback: These patients had to lobby for correct diabetes diagnoses. Was their race a reason? - Minnesota Best

  69. Pingback: These patients had to lobby for correct diabetes diagnoses. Was their race a reason? – Avant24 News

  70. Pingback: These patients had to lobby for correct diabetes diagnoses. Was their race a reason? Tribune News Service — The Denver Post – Romulan News Channel

  71. Pingback: [Baltimore Sun] These patients had to lobby for correct diabetes diagnoses. Was their race a reason? – The Baltimore Post

  72. Pingback: Esses pacientes tiveram que fazer lobby para diagnósticos corretos de diabetes. A raça deles foi um motivo? - Jornal do Nordeste

  73. Pingback: These patients had to lobby for correct diabetes diagnoses. Was their race a reason? – The Mercury News - galaxyconcerns

  74. Pingback: These patients had to lobby for correct diabetes diagnoses. Was their race a reason? – Seattle New

  75. Pingback: These patients had to lobby for correct diabetes diagnoses. Was their race a reason? – The Mercury News - ChroniclesLive

  76. Pingback: These patients had to lobby for correct diabetes diagnoses. Was their race a reason? – Chico Enterprise-Record

  77. Pingback: These patients had to lobby for correct diabetes diagnoses. Was their race a reason? – The Mercury News - WebTimes

  78. Pingback: These patients had to lobby for correct diabetes diagnoses. Was their race a reason? – The Mercury News - TodaysChronic

  79. Pingback: These patients had to lobby for correct diabetes diagnoses. Was their race a reason? – The Denver Post - Quick Telecast

  80. Pingback: These patients had to lobby for correct diabetes diagnoses. Was their race a reason? – The Denver Post - planetcirculate

  81. Pingback: These patients had to lobby for correct diabetes diagnoses. Was their race a reason? - SwiftTelecast

  82. Pingback: These sufferers needed to foyer for proper diabetes diagnoses. Was their race a motive?

  83. Pingback: These patients had to lobby for correct diabetes diagnoses. Was their race a reason? - YoursBulletin

  84. Pingback: These patients had to lobby for correct diabetes diagnoses. Was their race a reason? – The King County Scanner

  85. Pingback: These patients had to lobby for correct diabetes diagnoses. Was their race a reason? – Monterey Herald

  86. Pingback: These Patients Had to Lobby for Correct Diabetes Diagnoses. Was Their Race a Reason? – Health & fitness News

  87. Pingback: These Patients Had to Lobby for Correct Diabetes Diagnoses. Was Their Race a Reason? – Health & fitness News

Leave a reply to Judi Cancel reply